What is the Communications Law Bulletin?
The Communications Law Bulletin (CLB) discusses a wide range of communications law and policy issues and is distributed in hard copyand/or email to members as part of their membership.
Authors regularly include communications and media lawyers, industry representatives, academics, policy experts and law students.
Contributions and comments to the CLB are sought from members of the public including features, articles and case notes. We have a flexible word limit but most articles are about 1000-1500 words. Please send all contributions and comments to firstname.lastname@example.org
Past issues of the CLB are being progressively loaded onto this site and will be accessible here except for the four most recent issues.
2022 - Volume 41
Edited by Ashleigh Fehrenbach and Eli Fisher
A New ‘Single Up-to-date’ Online Safety Act Regime
Alex Hutchens, Partner, McCullough Roberston, discusses the Online Safety Act coming into effect earlier this year.
First Consideration of the ‘Serious Harm’ Test in Australian Defamation Action
The Supreme Court of New South Wales became the first Australian court to consider the serious harm test for a defamation action in Newman v Whittington  NSWSC 249 (Newman). Georgie Austin, Zoë Burchill, Blake Pappas and Richard Leder, (Corrs Chambers Westgarth) discuss its implications.
Profile: Timothy Webb, Partner, Clayton Utz
Ashleigh Fehrenbach, co-editor sits down with Tim to discuss his career and insights.
The High Court Considers: Does Google Search Publish Every Website on the Internet? Looking Forward to Google LLC v Defteros
Alex Tharby, Fabienne Sharbanee and Mhairi Stewart, media lawyers at Bennett + Co, consider the Google LLC v Defteros defamation litigation.
Massive Defamation Payout Awarded Over YouTube Videos –
Will Google Appeal?
Marlia Saunders, Partner, Thomson Geer summarises the recent Federal Court decision in Barilaro v Google LLC  FCA 650 (6 June 2022)
A New ‘Marker’ for Cyber Security Practices
Implications of the RI Advice Group Decision
Alec Christie (Partner), Avryl Lattin (Partner), Raeshell Staltare (Special Counsel), Christian Hofman (Associate), Alexia Psaltis (Associate), Clyde & Co, comment on ASIC v RI Advice, the first case to address whether failing to manage cyber risk is a breach of financial services obligations and, possibly, directors’ duties.
All Eyes on the Anti-Trolling Bill, But What About the Online Safety Act?
David Kim, Banki Haddock Fiora, comments on why the eSafety Commissioner’s expanded remit is on a collision course with the world of defamation.
Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code Gets a Makeover
Jaimie Wolbers, Simone Mitchell, Jonathan Kelp (MinterEllison) discuss what the new Therapeutic Goods Advertising Code 2021 will mean for advertisers.
To Be or Not to Be. Who Can Be an Inventor?
Helen Macpherson (Baker McKenzie Sydney), Tanvi Shah (Baker McKenzie, London) and Avi Toltzis (Baker McKenzie, Chicago) discuss the Thaler litigation, and the questions it raises about the recognition of AI as an inventor under patent law.
Out of Sight But Not Out of Jurisdiction –
Application of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) to Extra-Territorial Companies
Marlia Saunders & Jessie Nygh, Thomson Geer, discuss the recent findings of the Full Federal Court in Facebook Inc v the Australian Information Commissioner & what it means to ‘carry on business’ in Australia in the digital age.
Digital Platform Services Inquiry – March 2022 Interim Report
By Tara Taylor, McCullough Robertson
How to Treat an Angry Tweet – the Dutton v Bazzi Appeal
Kevin Lynch and Jade Tyrrell, Johnson Winter & Slattery, consider the Full Federal Court’s decision in Peter Dutton’s defamation proceedings
Source Confidentiality Under Siege:
How Law Enforcement Powers Threaten Journalists’ Ethical Obligations
Adam Lukacs, University of Queensland, in his CAMLA Essay Competition winning piece, comments on the legislative framework protecting the confidentiality of journalists’ sources.
FIRST, DO NO HARM: The Serious Harm Threshold in Defamation Cases involving Physician-Review websites
Nadine Mattini, University of Sydney, in her piece that won the second prize in CAMLA’s Essay Competition, writes about defamation cases involving physician-review websites and the harm that a negative review can have on a physician’s reputation in light of the serious harm threshold.
International Women’s Day Edition
After the success of our inaugural IWD special edition last year, we are pleased to again be sharing an edition of the CLB that celebrates the many illustrious and diverse contributions of some of our industry’s leading women. This edition contains a series of short interviews with around 40 leaders from a range of backgrounds and experiences across media, communications, IP, advertising, government, privacy, entertainment and tech.
You will hear brilliant stories from the bench, the bar, government, private practice, in house, and executive roles.
The CAMLA industries in Australia are driven by the intelligence, advocacy, warmth, leadership and persistence of many incredible women – and we are pleased to be able to share a sample of that in this bulletin.
Thank you to everyone who gave their time to be featured, and to the CAMLA Young Lawyers who conducted the interviews. This could not have gone ahead without all of you.
Enjoy the read!
Ashleigh Fehrenbach and Eli Fisher
In this issue:Angelene Falk
Bridget Fair GAICD
Ita Buttrose AC OBE
Judge Penelope Wass SC DCJ
Her Excellency the Honourable Margaret Beazley AC QC
Jane van Beelen
Julie Inman – Grant
Judge Judith Gibson